Being similar in price and target audience it’s definitely worthwhile checking out.This is the official website of the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP). For my testing, I will be rendering the same project on both machines using Premiere Pro CC.Filmmaker Max Yuryev is among those taking a deep look at video editing performance on the M1 Macs and took the time to compare a 13” MacBook Pro to the latest Razer Book 13 with Intel’s 11th-gen processors. While these machines both have different specs, the GL502VS is technically a gaming laptop, I was curious which one was better for video editing.That’s not the case with many other performance-oriented Windows laptops.The first real-world test uses Yuryev’s standard testing footage in Premiere. Yuryev does point out that the Razer is unique in its class by performing the same whether connected to AC power or running off battery. It is noticeable, but not as substantial as one might think.For CPU, the story is quite similar with the M1 taking the lead. That’s a bit surprising.Both systems use a form of integrated graphics and in Geekbench 5 tests it looks like Apple’s M1 chip takes a slight lead over Intel’s Iris Xe graphics. The Mac does have a higher price point to go along with double the SSD storage, however, Yuryev points out that if he went with a matching SSD size in the MacBook it would actually come out $100 cheaper than the Razer.
So, there’s not much we can glean from this test, but the Mac took 31 seconds and a comparable Dell XPS 13 took 1:15. The Mac jumped off to an early lead and the Razer… crashed. Compared to a 2019 Mac Pro that took 4:30 this is all impressive performance for a laptop.DaVinci also has an M1-optimized version of Resolve out and so Yuryev moved there for the same stabilization test. The MacBook completed the task in 3:06 and the Razer took 4:21. Is Or Windows Better For Video Editing Plus Some FilmThe Razer on the other hand has plenty of dropped frames here. The Mac maxes out its graphics but appears to show smooth footage. The footage is the same 4K footage we were looking at earlier with an added note that there are two LUTs applied plus some film grain. It’s unclear whether this is due to how the OS and app interact to share resources or simply a bug, but right now the M1 is winning by making full use of the components. Still, the M1 appears to be going much faster.Interestingly, the Razer isn’t actually maxing out the GPU or CPU whereas the Mac is maxing out the GPU. This actually uses Premiere’s built-in encoder as Yuryev wasn’t sure if Adobe Media Encoder had received a similar beta with M1 support. Considering earlier Geekbench tests didn’t show this much of a difference, this might come down to the hardware video encoders and decoders on the chips.Sticking with Resolve for a moment to do the playback test, again the Mac is smooth while the Razer struggles hard with it, dropping a majority of frames. Now that the usage is equivalent between the two computers we should see a more reasonable comparison.And even still, the M1 Mac exports the file in 4:55 while the Razer is way behind at 9:02. Blackmagic seems to be doing a better job with Resolve.When Yuryev moves to Resolve, the Razer’s GPU usage finally shoots up to max meaning it is maximizing performance for the export. If you are a video editor this is likely a big concern and if the M1 support gets better over time than the M-series Macs. Which would explain the significant performance differences. Get an emulator on mac for super mario worldThe Mac, again, was smooth, and the Razer only had some minor stuttering, which was dramatically better than the previous tests.In a surprise twist, in Premiere with H.265 footage both machines actually worked faster than with H.264—it might be time to upgrade your PC to make use of this.For exports, both were faster than before with Premiere delivering the file in 7:28 on the MacBook and 11:01 on the Razer. With the increased number of cameras shipping with H.265 and increased support for computers and programs Yuryev did take a quick look and surprisingly saw even better performance playing the footage back. This setup exported the clip in just 3:04, faster than Resolve at 4:55 and Premiere at 9:25.All the previous tests were running H.264 footage. This showed even more improvement over Resolve and Premiere, which shouldn’t really be a surprise as Apple’s integration with their hardware has always been the best. With significant performance gains, especially compared to similar Intel-based Windows systems, Apple Silicon might be the reason to upgrade or even switch to Mac.I’m keeping an eye on these systems, but I am totally ready for a more powerful iMac or even Mac Pro with Apple Silicon inside. And, Final Cut is down to just 2:25.The M1 chip is a game-changer for computers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJohn ArchivesCategories |